Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2350MHz vs 1400MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+123%
4.813 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
2.15 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc 140T Mobile
+210%
4012
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
1292
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc 140T Mobile
+224%
1986
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
612
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2022
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
