AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X
+43357%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2013
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
30W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
