AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X
+22191%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
51W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
