Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +50022%
163.4 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
130W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy