Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

AMD Instinct MI300X vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +1007%
163.4 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Instinct
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
8192
880
TMUs
256
0
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
146 billion
Transistors
8 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy