Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2100MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +3944%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Feb 2017
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
14592
Shading Units
1024
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
75W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
146 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net