AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
14584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+583709%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2009
Instinct
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
14592
Shading Units
8
880
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
760W
TDP
23W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
