AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+14255%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
640
880
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
65W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
