AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
14528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+76525%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Feb 2008
Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
14592
Shading Units
64
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
760W
TDP
70W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
