Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
14544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +96435%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
228
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
48
880
TMUs
24
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

760W
TDP
65W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy