NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1750MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A30 PCIe
+283%
10.32 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Blender
A30 PCIe
+290%
2036
Arc A310
521
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
