Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA A2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1770MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A2 +139%
4.531 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
A2
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2014
Quadro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
16
1280
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy