NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+539%
4.531 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
