NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+1584%
4.531 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
112
40
TMUs
28
32
ROPs
20
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.681 billion
Unknown
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
