NVIDIA A2 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+771%
4.531 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
400
40
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.627 billion
Unknown
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
