NVIDIA A2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+14059%
4.531 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
40
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
