NVIDIA A2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 60W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV380
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Rage 9
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
130 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.075 billion
Unknown
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-
