Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1695MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +147%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2017
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
852 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy