NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10M
+1659%
23.44 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
16
7168
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
48
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
