Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +5410%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
A10G +11863%
3589
Quadro K2000M
30

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
384
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK107
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net