Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1935GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +1588%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
A100 PCIe 80 GB +3841%
3823
Quadro K4000M
97
OctaneBench
A100 PCIe 80 GB +1450%
310
Quadro K4000M
20
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
5120bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1935GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
960
432
TMUs
80
160
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
80 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy