NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
9024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe
+6408%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
4
9216
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
62W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF106
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
