NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1455MHz vs 1163MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050
+4%
1.862 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M2000
1544
GeForce GTX 1050
+12%
1734
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M2000
+35%
690
GeForce GTX 1050
509
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 10
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GP107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
