Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel UHD Graphics 630 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1620MHz vs 1150MHz)
200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 630
0.423 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 Mobile
+194%
1.244 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
UHD Graphics 630
430
Quadro P600 Mobile
+173%
1174
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
UHD Graphics 630
198
Quadro P600 Mobile
+182%
559
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2017
HD Graphics
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Integrated
Type
Professional
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
1430 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
4GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
128bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
184
Shading Units
384
23
TMUs
24
3
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.92 GPixel/s
26.45 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.88 GTexel/s
846.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.44 GFLOPS
423.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.88 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Comet Lake GT2
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm+++
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
