AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
4880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 335W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+3408%
23.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
5120
Shading Units
240
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
28
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
335W
TDP
219W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 21 KXTX
(215-121000289)
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
