ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 24 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
May 2021
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
384
1
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
TU117
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6
