ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1650 GTO 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.54GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Dec 2007
Rage 2
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
256MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
TMUs
4
1
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV530
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Rage 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
3.0
