ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
May 2007
Rage 2
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
128MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV560
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Rage 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
3.0
