Home GPU Comparison ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Apr 1997
Release Date
Jul 2015
Rage 2
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
1
TMUs
224
1
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Rage IIC
GPU Name
Fiji
Rage IIC PCI (215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

5.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net