ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2013
Rage 2
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
1
TMUs
20
1
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Oland
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.1
