ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 27 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
19456 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2025
Rage 2
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
288GB
SDR
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
19456
1
TMUs
1216
1
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram X
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
153 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
N/A
