ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Mar 2016
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
1
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GM206
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
-
Shader Model
6.4
