ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2008
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G96C
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
-
Shader Model
4.0
