ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs Intel Arc Pro A50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 25 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2022
Rage 2
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
6GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1024
1
TMUs
64
1
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
DG2-128
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Rage 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.6
