UHD Graphics 630 vs FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
UHD Graphics 630 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1150MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
FirePro A300 's Advantages
200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 630
423
FirePro A300
+64%
695
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
184
Shading Units
384
23
TMUs
24
3
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
3.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
26.45 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
846.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
423.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Comet Lake GT2
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 9.5
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+++
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.5
Shader Model
5.0