Tesla P4 vs Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Tesla P4 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla P4 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1114MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla P4
+305%
5704
Quadro M2000M
1405
3DMark Time Spy
Tesla P4
+283%
4527
Quadro M2000M
1180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Tesla P4
+271%
2049
Quadro M2000M
552
Blender
Tesla P4
+193%
388
Quadro M2000M
132
OctaneBench
Tesla P4
+150%
85
Quadro M2000M
34
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
886 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
640
160
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
71.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
178.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
89.12 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.704 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
178.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GM107
GP104-895-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
