Tesla K20s vs Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20s and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla K20s 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20s
+497%
2870
Quadro 2000D
480
Graphics Card
Feb 2013
Release Date
Oct 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
2496
Shading Units
192
208
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
119.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
2.870 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
956.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
