Tesla C2075 vs Quadro Plex 2100 S4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 S4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (247W vs 640W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+197%
1028
Quadro Plex 2100 S4
346
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
16
448
Shading Units
128
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
247W
TDP
640W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G80
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
