Tesla C2075 vs Quadro P400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+60%
1028
Quadro P400
641
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
448
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GP107
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
