Tesla C2075 vs Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+3853%
1028
Quadro FX 360M
26
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
247W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G86
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
