Tesla C2075 vs GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
GRID RTX T10 2
+872%
9999
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2020
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
56
448
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
TU102
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
