Tesla C2075 vs GRID M60 2Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
GRID M60 2Q
+369%
4825
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GM204
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
