Tesla C2075 vs Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+2061%
22220
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
7168
56
TMUs
448
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
100 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
