Tesla C2050 vs Quadro NVS 130M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
+7807%
1028
Quadro NVS 130M
13
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
1
448
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
238W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G86
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
G86-613-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
