Tesla C2050 vs Quadro 6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (204W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1028
Quadro 6000
1028
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
750 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
448
56
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GF100
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
