Tesla C2050 vs A10 PCIe
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
8768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1028
A10 PCIe
+2938%
31240
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
72
448
Shading Units
9216
56
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA102
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
