T600 Mobile vs FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Mobile and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
T600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Mobile
+53%
2527
FirePro W6150M
1651
3DMark Time Spy
T600 Mobile
+86%
2715
FirePro W6150M
1452
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
45.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
78.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
5.053 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.527 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
78.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5