Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Google Tensor G2
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 1600MHz Samsung Exynos 7870 vs. 8 cores 2850MHz Google Tensor G2 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Samsung Exynos 7870 's Advantages
Lower TDP (3W vs 7W)
Google Tensor G2 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (1.1424 TFLOPS vs 0.0224 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2850MHz vs 1600MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Exynos 7870
146176
Google Tensor G2
+520%
907387
FP32 (float)
Samsung Exynos 7870
22
Google Tensor G2
+5090%
1142
CPU
8x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
1600 MHz
Frequency
2850 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
-
L3 cache
0
14 nm
Process
5 nm
2
Transistor count
-
3 W
TDP
7 W
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
Graphics
Mali-T830 MP1
GPU name
Mali-G710 MP7
700 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
1
Execution units
7
16
Shading units
96
4
Max size
16
0.0224 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.1424 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
1.3
1.2
OpenCL version
2.0
11
DirectX version
-
Memory
LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR5
933 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
1x 32 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
51.2 Gbit/s
AI
-
NPU
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Multimedia (ISP)
No
Neural processor (NPU)
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Modem
Exynos 5300g
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 6
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 3670 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
6
4.1
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
