RTX A6000 vs Quadro M6000 24 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1800MHz vs 1114MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+465%
38710
Quadro M6000 24 GB
6844
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A6000
+173%
17742
Quadro M6000 24 GB
6494
Blender
RTX A6000
+1060%
5387
Quadro M6000 24 GB
464
OctaneBench
RTX A6000
+391%
600
Quadro M6000 24 GB
122
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s
Render Config
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
3072
336
TMUs
256
112
ROPs
96
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
