RTX A6000 vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
10560 additional rendering cores
Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+8278%
38710
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
84
SM Count
24
10752
Shading Units
192
336
TMUs
64
112
ROPs
24
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
